Then we examine some of the literature on framing effects-especially as it pertains to moral philosophy. Along the way, we first provide an overview of what Sinnott-Armstrong calls the Master Argument against intuitionism. In this paper, we are going to try to add more fuel to the empirical fire that Sinnott-Armstrong has placed under the feet of the intuitionist. More specifically, he has suggested that insofar as our moral intuitions are subject to what psychologists call framing effects, this poses a real problem for moral intuitionism. Educational Psychologist, 45, 28–36.In a series of recent papers, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong has used findings in social psychology to put pressure on the claim that our moral beliefs can be non-inferentially justified. The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 850–856. Empathy and attribution: Turning observers into actors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213–225. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 171–193. The how and what of why: Some determinants and consequences of causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 491–514. Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: New answers to an old question. The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1208–1219. The fundamental fundamental attribution error: Correspondence bias in individualist and collectivist cultures. Causal schemata and the attribution process. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 467–477. Further appraisal of correspondent inference theory. The American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. An experimental study of apparent behavior. The psychology of interpersonal relations. Social perception and phenomenal causality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 24–33. Consensus and consistency: Exposure to multiple discrimination claims shapes Whites’ intergroup attitudes. Review of General Psychology, 3, 23–43.Ĭarter, E. Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |